We build custom AI agents that don't just answer questions — they plan, call tools, and take multi-step action across your systems, with the guardrails and approval gates that make autonomy safe to deploy.
Planning, tool access, guardrails, and audit trails — the full system that makes autonomous action safe to trust.
Plans, calls tools, and executes multi-step tasks across your systems — not a single-turn chatbot.
Secure connections to internal systems and third-party APIs, with per-tool permission boundaries.
Checkpoints where a human signs off before high-stakes or irreversible actions.
Short and long-term memory so agents stay coherent across multi-step, multi-session tasks.
Every decision, tool call, and outcome logged for review, debugging, and compliance.
Coordinated crews of specialized agents that hand off tasks and share context.
Per-task latency and inference-cost tracking, so spend and speed don't quietly drift.
Six shapes of agent we've designed for — each one replacing a workflow, not sitting beside it.
Classify, route, and resolve tier-1 tickets end-to-end, with human handoff the moment a request leaves the autopilot envelope.
Enrich, score, and schedule inbound leads directly in your CRM — before a rep has to open it.
Dispatch, exception-handling, and workflow orchestration that reasons over real operational data, not just trigger rules.
Multi-source retrieval and reasoning over proprietary documents, with citations and hallucination guards built in.
Conversational analytics over your data warehouse — ask a question, get a chart, and audit every step it ran.
Coordinated agent crews that hand off tasks and share context to solve problems a single agent can't.
The same agent patterns, organised by the function they support rather than the industry — useful if your team spans several.
Sales reps spent hours a week manually updating CRM records, drafting follow-up emails, and scheduling next steps after every call — repetitive work that ate into actual selling time.
We built a multi-step agent that listens for call-completion events, drafts CRM updates and follow-up emails for rep approval, and auto-schedules next steps — with a hard approval gate before any email actually sends.
*Illustrative example based on a representative engagement.
Identify the multi-step task, the tools involved, and where human judgement must stay in the loop.
Define the planning loop, tool permissions, memory needs, and approval gates.
Build the agent with scoped tool access, guardrails, and a full audit trail from day one.
Ship to a small pilot group, measure task success, then expand scope once trust is earned.
Agents that stand up fast are easy. Agents that survive contact with production need all six of these.
Multi-step reasoning, planning, and tool-use — one framework chosen per task, not one for all.
Models evaluated per task — reasoning vs. throughput vs. cost — with fine-tuning where domain accuracy earns its budget.
Agents that read your docs, query your databases, and call your APIs without prompt-engineering every new tool.
Auth, permissions, rate limits, and audit trails for agents operating inside real systems — not adapters.
Permission boundaries, human approval checkpoints, and kill-switches — agents treated as privileged users.
Task-level tracing, tool-call logs, and cost-per-task dashboards — instrumented like any other production service.
A chatbot answers questions in a single turn. An agent plans a sequence of steps, calls tools, and takes real action across your systems — with guardrails deciding what it can do without asking first.
Configurable approval gates. You decide which actions need a human sign-off (e.g. sending an email, moving money) and which the agent can complete autonomously, based on your risk tolerance.
Yes — we build scoped, permissioned connectors to your internal systems, whether that's a REST API, a database, or an internal tool with no public API at all.
A task-success evaluation suite measures completion rate, guardrail catches, and human override frequency — the same evaluation discipline we apply to every AI system we build.
It halts and escalates to a human rather than guessing. Every agent we build has a defined failure mode — stop and ask, not silently proceed.
A workflow follows a fixed sequence — input moves through predefined steps to a predictable output. An agent decides which steps to take, in what order, using which tools. Workflows are deterministic and easier to reason about; agents are adaptive and suit tasks where the right path depends on the input. For repeatable processes, a workflow is often simpler and more reliable — we'll tell you honestly which one your use case actually needs.
No, and it shouldn't try to. Agents work best as an intelligent layer that reads data via APIs and triggers actions inside the systems you already run, not as a replacement for them. The agents we build are integration multipliers — they make your existing CRM or ERP more useful, not obsolete.
A 30-minute call. We'll tell you honestly whether this is the right solution — and what it would take.